How does shakespeare in love end
Takes a woman to know it. Question : How did Will not recognise Viloa in her boy disguise? Even in disguise, you can clearly see it's her, and she didn't sound like a boy. Answer: In real life, Viola, of course, would be recognized as a female in disguise. However, in literature, film, opera, etc, it often is necessary to employ what is known as a "suspension of disbelief. We go along with the idea that no one realizes Viola is actually a woman, so that we can enjoy the overall story. As the Queen says, this is how it ends: "As stories must when love is denied: with tears, and a journey.
We get tears and a journey when Viola must leave with Lord Wessex, her husband, to America. Before she leaves, she inspires Will to write Twelfth Night in which he imagines her ship wrecks, killing everyone especially Wessex who he probably fantasizes being eaten by sharks as well , but Viola survives.
A comedy about a cross-dressing shipwreck survivor? That sounds like a good sequel… or an episode of Gilligan's Island. Will almost quits writing, he's so depressed, but Viola tells him, "If my hurt is to be that you will write no more, then I shall be the sorrier.
It isn't the loss of her acting career or her freedom that she laments, but the possibly that this man might never write again. Will finds hope in tragedy, which is easy enough for him considering he isn't being shipped across the Atlantic with a man he doesn't love.
He immortalizes Viola as the heroine of Twelfth Night, saying "she will be my heroine for all time. Tale about a fictional relationship between William Shakespeare and a young woman who poses as a man in order to star in one of the writer's plays. Suffering from writer's block, Shakespeare is in need of a new muse.
He soon finds inspiration in the form of a beautiful female aristocrat, but her daring determination to act in his play puts their already forbidden relationship on even more dangerous ground.
What is the setting of Shakespeare? Shakespeare's Settings Shakespeare's plays are set in many exotic locations, from Verona and Milan to Athens and Rousillon. How did Shakespeare feel about love? William Shakespeare doesnt have one specific feeling for love.
In his plays he thinks that love can be unfair, confusing, crazy, unpredictable, and uncontrollable. This shows that the love relationship that Romeo and Juliet have is so strong that only death can show their true feelings for each other.
What is truth to Shakespeare? How many Oscars did Shakespeare in Love win? What does Romeo and Juliet say about love? Love is naturally the play's dominant and most important theme. If you click on that link and compare my star ratings, you'll note that I don't think that's too much of a problem - certainly not compared to how Shakespeare in Love also beat The Thin Red Line for that Oscar.
The point is, whether it was the best of five arbitrarily-selected films or not, Shakespeare in Love is pretty damn good, and deserves better than to be forever thought of as the unfair winner of an award that very rarely has enough of a sense of humor to go for anything this legitimately pleasurable to watch. It's a wonderful combination of the old-fashioned and the new; the new comes largely in the form of its Tom Stoppard screenplay rewriting an original draft by Marc Norman , which has a zippy, postmodern-lite take on the matter of how to do a costume drama.
People speak with modern or, at least, '90s-modern attitude and cadences, but the words they say have a distinct out-of-time quality; there's not much if anything that's period-authentic about the vocabulary of this costume drama set in , but it does a fine job of suggesting a more formal, stately, stagelike way of speaking that keeps the contemporary vibe from turning the rest of the film into a mockery.
Meanwhile, the quantity of theater-nerd in-jokes makes the whole thing feel like a meta-narrative game, in which we're constantly reminded that we're watching a movie about William Shakespeare, and that the whole thing is a bit of a ludicrous construction. Very Stoppard-esque, that. The old-fashioned part is, well, the ludicrous construction.
Shakespeare in Love is, for all its cleverness and wit and cunning, pretty dumb, actually: it's the story of how Shakespeare Joseph Fiennes was only able to write Romeo and Juliet because incidents and overheard snatches of speech in his everyday life kept giving him inspiration to directly incorporate those things into the drama.
Specifically, it's about how his passionate, whirlwind romance with Viola De Lesseps Gwyneth Paltrow , a woman much above his station, helped to break his writer's block, by showing him what love truly is. The low-hanging fruit here is, of course, that Shakespeare didn't write the story of Romeo and Juliet at all; as with virtually all of his plays, he was adapting fairly well-known source material into his own highly characteristic idiom, and so there would have been no tormented process of devising a narrative.
And that's hardly the only blatant historical falsehood involved in the film's plot. But the thing is, there's no aspect of the film that pretends to be sober history. This is pure Hollywood fluff, and if you take out all the sex and some of the more literate jokes, it's pretty easy to imagine exactly this story being told in mostly this way at any point during the height of the star system in the '30s or '40s.
It's candy: gorgeous, sumptuous costumes worn on gorgeous, sumptuous sets by a murderer's row of frightfully talented actors giving their all to making sure we're having as good a time as possible enjoying the lighthearted fluff in front of us. Though if something is this well-mounted, with such charismatic performances breathing life into the handsomely puffed-up dialogue, how fluffy can it be?
The film does, in its way, have something interesting though not original things to say about the creative process and how we - artists or otherwise - can be inspired to become our best and most energetic selves when we find someone wonderful to share a portion of our life with.
0コメント