What is the difference between outlay cost and opportunity cost

Because opportunity costs are, by definition, unseen, they can be easily overlooked. Understanding the potential missed opportunities when a business or individual chooses one investment over another allows for better decision-making. The formula for calculating an opportunity cost is simply the difference between the expected returns of each option.

Say that you have option A—to invest in the stock market hoping to generate capital gain returns. Meanwhile, Option B is to reinvest your money back into the business, expecting that newer equipment will increase production efficiency, leading to lower operational expenses and a higher profit margin. In other words, by investing in the business, you would forgo the opportunity to earn a higher return. While financial reports do not show opportunity costs, business owners often use the concept to make educated decisions when they have multiple options before them.

Bottlenecks , for instance, often result in opportunity costs. Opportunity cost analysis plays a crucial role in determining a business's capital structure. A firm incurs an expense in issuing both debt and equity capital to compensate lenders and shareholders for the risk of investment, yet each also carries an opportunity cost. Funds used to make payments on loans, for example, cannot be invested in stocks or bonds, which offer the potential for investment income.

The company must decide if the expansion made by the leveraging power of debt will generate greater profits than it could make through investments.

A firm tries to weigh the costs and benefits of issuing debt and stock, including both monetary and nonmonetary considerations, to arrive at an optimal balance that minimizes opportunity costs. Because opportunity cost is a forward-looking consideration, the actual rate of return for both options is unknown today, making this evaluation tricky in practice. Assume the company in the above example forgoes new equipment and instead invests in the stock market.

It is equally possible that, had the company chosen new equipment, there would be no effect on production efficiency, and profits would remain stable. It is important to compare investment options that have a similar risk. Comparing a Treasury bill , which is virtually risk-free, to investment in a highly volatile stock can cause a misleading calculation.

Government backs the rate of return of the T-bill, while there is no such guarantee in the stock market. When assessing the potential profitability of various investments, businesses look for the option that is likely to yield the greatest return. Often, they can determine this by looking at the expected rate of return RoR for an investment vehicle. However, businesses must also consider the opportunity cost of each alternative option. No matter which option the business chooses, the potential profit it gives up by not investing in the other option is the opportunity cost.

Alternatively, if the business purchases a new machine, it will be able to increase its production of widgets. The machine setup and employee training will be intensive, and the new machine will not be up to maximum efficiency for the first couple years. Since the company has limited funds to invest in either option, it must make a choice. According to this, the opportunity cost for choosing the securities makes sense in the first and second years.

A sunk cost is money already spent in the past, while opportunity cost is the potential returns not earned in the future on an investment because the capital was invested elsewhere. This is the amount of money paid out to invest, and getting that money back requires liquidating stock at or above the purchase price.

From an accounting perspective, a sunk cost could also refer to the initial outlay to purchase an expensive piece of heavy equipment, which might be amortized over time, but which is sunk in the sense that you won't be getting it back. Again, an opportunity cost describes the returns that one could have earned if the money were instead invested in another instrument.

As an investor who has already sunk money into investments, you might find another investment that promises greater returns. The opportunity cost of holding the underperforming asset may rise to the point where the rational investment option is to sell and invest in the more promising investment. In economics, risk describes the possibility that an investment's actual and projected returns are different and that the investor loses some or all of the principal.

Opportunity cost concerns the possibility that the returns of a chosen investment are lower than the returns of a forgone investment.

The key difference is that risk compares the actual performance of an investment against the projected performance of the same investment, while opportunity cost compares the actual performance of an investment against the actual performance of another investment.

For example, the opportunity cost of using capital is the interest that it can earn in the next best use with equal risk. A distinction between outlay costs and opportunity costs can be drawn on the basis of the nature of the sacrifice. Outlay costs involve financial expenditure at some point of time and hence are recorded in the books of account.

Opportunity cost is the amount or subjective value that is foregone in choosing one activity over the next best alternative. It relates to sacrificed alternatives; it is, in general not recorded in the books of account. Outlay costs are also paid to vendors to acquire goods such as inventory or services, such as consulting or software design. They are concrete expenses that are actually incurred in order to achieve a goal.

Outlay costs are easy to recognize and measure because they have actually been paid to outside vendors, as opposed to opportunity costs which are not actually incurred and paid to outside parties by the company. For corporations, outlay costs for new projects include start-up, production, and asset acquisition costs. They can also include hiring costs for strategies or projects that require an addition to the workforce in order to be carried out.

Outlay costs include the expenses paid by a business in order to manufacture a product or provide a service, and also include fees paid to outside parties to acquire assets or services. In cash accounting , outlay costs immediately reduce earnings.

In accrual accounting , outlay costs are split across all the periods that the expense applies to and matched to related revenues. Outlay costs do not include foregone profits or benefits—such costs are known as opportunity costs and are hidden, but an important component of a business's profitability.

Outlay costs, sometimes referred to as explicit costs, are direct expenses paid. These expenses can be one-time, such as repair bills, or recurring—e. Direct costs can also be predictable, e. Meanwhile, the total cost is both the outlay cost and opportunity cost. So while outlay costs include direct payment, total costs include any indirect losses or missed benefits. That is, opportunity costs are those benefits a business misses out on by choosing one option over another.

For example, if XYZ Manufacturing Company wants to purchase a new widget press they will not only have to pay for the widget press but for the fees associated with transporting the widget press to their facility, as well as the costs for getting the widget press up and running and possibly expenses for training workers to use the new widget press. All of these are outlay costs associated with acquiring a new widget press.

Then there are the implied costs of choosing one widget press over another. In addition, the other opportunity costs include choosing the widget press over another type of equipment or method.

Tools for Fundamental Analysis. Corporate Finance. Your Privacy Rights. To change or withdraw your consent choices for Investopedia.